Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 13:06
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Tom Hanks finally breaks his silence on daughter’s bombshell memoir: ‘Not surprised’ - New York Post
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
When reading can – and can't – help with mental health - BBC
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What happens when you get sick in a country with universal healthcare? What's the process like?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
10 Habits that are Aging Your Gut, According to Experts - EatingWell
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Has Messi scored against the Buffon?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What are some uses for cucumbers other than eating them plain or in salads?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.